Author Topic: Chi running  (Read 12935 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Belgian Lace

  • Guest
Re: Chi running
« Reply #20 on: December 02, 2014, 11:03:55 AM »
It's actually the reason the phrase "shut up & run" was invented.

:ok:

Offline tenacious1

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 16567
Re: Chi running
« Reply #21 on: December 02, 2014, 11:13:17 AM »

Offline cindyleigh

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 10603
Re: Chi running
« Reply #22 on: December 02, 2014, 12:03:14 PM »
I read the book many years ago when I had my first injury and didn't know what was wrong with me.  I can mail you the book and you can keep it, I sure as hell don't want it back!!

That JBM, I think I will look for the audiobook ...it may be easier to try the posture while listening.  But that was very nice of you  :d

I was once asked by an editor at Runner's World to clear up any confusion over this matter, and here was my reply:...

--

That was a great read!  Thanks!

Offline JimR

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 8864
Re: Chi running
« Reply #23 on: December 02, 2014, 12:39:33 PM »
You actually don't want much forward acceleration/propulsion when you run at a steady pace, it's wasted.  You need only enough to overcome air resistance, and this isn't much.

The 'lean' is actually unavoidable, for all runners.  When your foot is on the ground, it spends most of that time behind your center of mass, so you already incur a forward lean, like it or not.  Force application on that foot has both forward and upward components, and, unless you are accelerating, you want as little forward component as necessary.  otherwise you'll be forced to dump it by braking and wasting energy to maintain even pace.  You do need to overcome gravity, since very little of your stride has your foot directly under your center of mass, and that's where you want your energy to go.  Efficient running means keeping very little contact time with your foot on the ground and apply the most force with the foot close to directly underneath and slightly behind.

Offline Ileneforward

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 27139
Re: Chi running
« Reply #24 on: December 02, 2014, 02:04:29 PM »
Of course leaning forward is ideal!   :preen:   But they are trying to make a *secret* out of it.

and jomike, that chia running does work!  To keep your noggin warm!
@artbydmcbride

Offline Unidentified Flying Urchin

  • When last seen zhe was crossing the event horizon
  • *****
  • Posts: 13346
  • There is no spring for you
Re: Chi running
« Reply #25 on: December 03, 2014, 04:02:07 PM »
I read the book and liked most of it. I ignore the new-agey stuff that doesn't do anything for me, but the form decriptions were helpful to me.
This exactly. Seems logical to sort your form out before upping the mileage at lot, but I'm no expert.
Thanks for the advice. I will not heed it as I think you are wrong. - VP of Tea

Har har.  No, seriously, I have embryos in formalin on my dresser. - CheryG

shit has a magical way of cascading in whichever direction you tend to point - gebuh

Offline i am party

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 15897
Re: Chi running
« Reply #26 on: December 03, 2014, 04:03:38 PM »
Thanks.

And if anyone wants the book, it's on my shelf and free to whomever wants to give me their address.

Offline Rochey

  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 2417
Re: Chi running
« Reply #27 on: December 03, 2014, 11:00:53 PM »
I took a pose running clinic, which sounds similar, and here is my $.02.

I'm an accountant. I'm not a sports physiologist, chiropractor, or coach. I just run what I'm told to run, which tends to be lots of miles. Lots of miles that became lots of sloppy miles, and eventually my hip flexors, hamstrings, and glutes all said "no mas". I disagree with the idea that you'll perfect your form and gain efficiency with lots of miles. I think with lots of miles comes laziness and complacency.

Some of it was bunk. The thrust was to strike midfoot, engage your core, keep your shoulders, hips, legs square, and pull up rather than kick back. The idea is to take load off your quads. The biggest question mark I have is the consistent cadence...how can you do this if you're running easy or racing?

In general, I've incorporated some of the bullet points into my running because it really can't hurt. I'm not sure if I'm running relatively pain free because of that alone, or the combination with strength training and rehab. Anything that helps me focus on my form is probably worth the $50.

siamesedream

  • Guest
Re: Chi running
« Reply #28 on: December 04, 2014, 12:46:57 AM »
I do 100 meter strides and try to run them with decent form, my hope is that some of it will translate to better form on my longer runs.



Offline Fionn mac Cumhail

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 73649
  • El Superbeasto
    • The 44-40s
Re: Chi running
« Reply #29 on: December 04, 2014, 09:07:29 AM »
The biggest question mark I have is the consistent cadence...how can you do this if you're running easy or racing?

Don't open up as much...I got pretty decent at 180 steps per minute whether slow or fast...but it NEVER felt natural, and I went back to my intrinsic gate...

iwuzwilson

  • Guest
Re: Chi running
« Reply #30 on: December 04, 2014, 03:56:00 PM »
I took a pose running clinic, which sounds similar, and here is my $.02.

I'm an accountant. I'm not a sports physiologist, chiropractor, or coach. I just run what I'm told to run, which tends to be lots of miles. Lots of miles that became lots of sloppy miles, and eventually my hip flexors, hamstrings, and glutes all said "no mas". I disagree with the idea that you'll perfect your form and gain efficiency with lots of miles. I think with lots of miles comes laziness and complacency.
Some of it was bunk. The thrust was to strike midfoot, engage your core, keep your shoulders, hips, legs square, and pull up rather than kick back. The idea is to take load off your quads. The biggest question mark I have is the consistent cadence...how can you do this if you're running easy or racing?

In general, I've incorporated some of the bullet points into my running because it really can't hurt. I'm not sure if I'm running relatively pain free because of that alone, or the combination with strength training and rehab. Anything that helps me focus on my form is probably worth the $50.

The drills and pick ups (which can be taken as form running) are supposed to help with that.

Offline Arrojo

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 30714
Re: Chi running
« Reply #31 on: December 04, 2014, 09:05:55 PM »
People are born knowing how to run naturally.  Watch children play - they run, they don't think about their form, they just do what comes naturally.  Everyone knows how to run.  It's not rocket science.  I tell people they shouldn't be messing around with their form too much, just run naturally.   Sure, you can tinker with it and find improvement.  But if you are thinking about your running form too much while you are running, you are doing it wrong.  Just run naturally.  rochey's post is a good reference for how tinkering may help you.  i am party's post explains in better detail why completely changing one's form , a la 'chi', is bunk.

One day a new woman showed up to one of our track practices.  She was doing the pose method, leaping around the track like a dear. She was a good runner, she was keeping up with the faster people.  But it looked ridiculous and anything but natural.  We never saw her again.  Not sure why.  I've seen some odd running styles in my day, but if running oddly is your natural way of running, then its perfectly fine.  Just run.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2014, 09:13:21 PM by Arrojo »
Hockey sucks

Offline fancypants

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 14470
    • Unanswered Flurry
Re: Chi running
« Reply #32 on: December 05, 2014, 06:43:53 AM »
To a certain extent we were born to run, but my natural running style has wreaked havoc on my aging body. Or maybe it's that my body isn't made for lots of running. If I kept running without some PT then I'm pretty sure I'd  eventually not be able to walk.

Take what I say with a grain of salt, though. I'm really just a hobby jogger.
I don't have time for laundry; I'm trying to have a great life.

http://herheiness.wordpress.com/

Offline caribougrrl

  • Passed on to another Brane
  • *****
  • Posts: 19866
Re: Chi running
« Reply #33 on: December 05, 2014, 06:55:02 AM »
People are born knowing how to run naturally.  Watch children play - they run, they don't think about their form, they just do what comes naturally.  Everyone knows how to run.  It's not rocket science.  I tell people they shouldn't be messing around with their form too much, just run naturally.   Sure, you can tinker with it and find improvement.  But if you are thinking about your running form too much while you are running, you are doing it wrong.  Just run naturally.  rochey's post is a good reference for how tinkering may help you.  i am party's post explains in better detail why completely changing one's form , a la 'chi', is bunk.

One day a new woman showed up to one of our track practices.  She was doing the pose method, leaping around the track like a dear. She was a good runner, she was keeping up with the faster people.  But it looked ridiculous and anything but natural.  We never saw her again.  Not sure why.  I've seen some odd running styles in my day, but if running oddly is your natural way of running, then its perfectly fine.  Just run.

ironically, that's exactly how the chi running book starts...

Offline cindyleigh

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 10603
Re: Chi running
« Reply #34 on: December 05, 2014, 12:40:10 PM »
People are born knowing how to run naturally.  Watch children play - they run, they don't think about their form, they just do what comes naturally.  Everyone knows how to run.  It's not rocket science.  I tell people they shouldn't be messing around with their form too much, just run naturally.   Sure, you can tinker with it and find improvement.  But if you are thinking about your running form too much while you are running, you are doing it wrong.  Just run naturally.  rochey's post is a good reference for how tinkering may help you.  i am party's post explains in better detail why completely changing one's form , a la 'chi', is bunk.

One day a new woman showed up to one of our track practices.  She was doing the pose method, leaping around the track like a dear. She was a good runner, she was keeping up with the faster people.  But it looked ridiculous and anything but natural.  We never saw her again.  Not sure why.  I've seen some odd running styles in my day, but if running oddly is your natural way of running, then its perfectly fine.  Just run.

I just looked at some Pose running videos.  Its frustrating for me because when I watch these videos of pose or chi running, there are only a few secs. of folks actually running with these methods ...and they just look like they are running to me.

Offline Arrojo

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 30714
Re: Chi running
« Reply #35 on: December 05, 2014, 04:13:23 PM »
ironically, that's exactly how the chi running book starts...

It is ironic in that chi running is anything but natural.
Hockey sucks

Offline Rochey

  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 2417
Re: Chi running
« Reply #36 on: December 06, 2014, 08:58:30 AM »
I just looked at some Pose running videos.  Its frustrating for me because when I watch these videos of pose or chi running, there are only a few secs. of folks actually running with these methods ...and they just look like they are running to me.

It's very subtle and no one can tell when I'm doing it. If nothing else, it helps me focus on engaging my core.

 

+-SUPPORT US

Powered by EzPortal