Author Topic: How do you all feel about age-graded calculators?  (Read 6422 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ice Cream

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 19226
How do you all feel about age-graded calculators?
« on: October 24, 2014, 08:25:00 AM »
I question how fast I should have been able to run, as predicted by these.

Offline Richard21142

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 9422
Re: How do you all feel about age-graded calculators?
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2014, 09:13:56 AM »
Age-grade calculators are something that makes you feel better about being old.

Offline rayman54

  • Just Getting Started
  • Posts: 3
Re: How do you all feel about age-graded calculators?
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2014, 02:34:40 PM »
I find that they work quite well.  I've been doing a particular race for the past 25 years.  I plotted my age graded time vs. year and the result is a horizontal curve.  They were years where I had bad races and those data points are noticeably offset from the horizontal curve

Offline Arrojo

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 31580
Re: How do you all feel about age-graded calculators?
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2014, 02:40:22 PM »
They are quite accurate for me, because I have been racing competetively for 40 years, I know how fast I used to be.  An age-graded PR is a beautiful thing.
Trump sucks

iwuzwilson

  • Guest
Re: How do you all feel about age-graded calculators?
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2014, 03:44:19 PM »
They are quite useful for comparing performance within an age class, but there is a bias, softening of the curve, as we get older. Particularly seen in older women. Libby James of Colorado recently scored a 106%. That's effectively impossible but it's what the calculator says.

Offline Ice Cream

  • The Runners
  • ******
  • Posts: 19226
Re: How do you all feel about age-graded calculators?
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2014, 07:42:24 PM »
They are quite useful for comparing performance within an age class, but there is a bias, softening of the curve, as we get older. Particularly seen in older women. Libby James of Colorado recently scored a 106%. That's effectively impossible but it's what the calculator says.

Don't know how this percentage works.  Mine said I would have done a 3:18 marathon equivalent... 

 

Powered by EzPortal