Total Members Voted: 3
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Further reflection - I'm guessing that you believe a HIM is easier than a marathon which I find interesting. Does that conclusion imply the intensity you would run a marathon and therefore the toll that it would exact would be greater than the variety and bike segment of the HIM which you find less taxing?The other thing that would factor into an individuals assessment is the swim which would stop many before they even got started.
I'm just gonna recuse myself, here
Yes, maybe I shouldn't have made that statement.I kind of didn't want to weigh in..but darn no votes.And I agree with all your assessments 100%... and yet, wonder if we come to opposite conclusions...
A marathon is 26.2 miles of running. A full Ironman is that plus a shitload of bicycling and swimming, correct? What am I missing?
BQ is JV level. Try sub 2:50, 2:40, 2:30, 2:20. i.e., I would say a sub 15 5K (17 for women) is tougher to do than just finishing a marathon (or BQing) or dong a tri.
Huh. IM hands down. I’m not brave enough to ever try one.
The original question is loaded by not being qualified. At what level are you talking about? I suppose if you are talking about a relatively same level of performance then the IM is tougher because the effort is 3-4 times longer than a full marathon. Takes talent and years of hard work to run a fast 5K. BQs are at the 65-70% age grade level. Just finishing an IM tri would be hard but it's doable if you have the time and resources to train for it. So my point is higher performance level is more difficult to achieve--therefore harder--than finishing event. OT marathon qualifier is >>>> more difficult than IM finish in 14 hours or a BQ.
Well duh. Colleen derueck is not doing 14 hours for her ironmans, more like 10-10:30, pretty sure she has a few OT under her belt. Maybe I should just ask her.😜
what? Did I instigate some controversy?not over analyzing - but a bit of context does matter--otherwise it's all pretty much a wash.