0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
According to my SIL, she wouldn't remarry because she'd lose the money.Even though she'd retired from a Federal job, she was getting alimony. Yep, in this day and age.None of that other stuff mattered as much as the money.
The only disatisfaction I have with being married is the chronic struggle against being treated like the concierge of a bed and breakfast. We both work fulltime, but yes I do the shopping and cleaning, and that is okay, ....but remarks when the cleaning isn't up to his standard, or we run out of something he wants (peanut butter!) Scrub it yourself then!Since he is gone 3 days in a row, that part is good. But I do worry about when we come to retirement time. Maybe we should live in separate houses then........
Mother in law suite. He can go live in it for three days every week.
it's been incredibly liberating and given me the chance to be 'me' again. And turns out I actually kinda like myself
I love that I control my life right now; it's been incredibly liberating and given me the chance to be 'me' again. And turns out I actually kinda like myself
Sing it, sista!I have my kids 100% so I haven't seen the benefit of number 6. Let's jsut say it has been challenging.
It's why I love being a sahm. I have no problem doing any of that mundane stuff, and it makes me less of a person because I know that even the most liberated working woman has to clean her toilet, wash her clothes, and cook for herself. And them some if they are married.
It makes you less of a person for saying 'liberated working woman' like it's 1974, Helen Reddy.
Good for her.
Yeah, it's great to play the victim and take advantage of someone else, I mean, the alternative would be responsibility.
Suuure. Depending on the length of the marriage and the salaries involved, she deserves alimony...just as he would, if she was the main breadwinner. It has nothing to do with being a victim. It has everything to do with investing in someone else's career and supporting the family. By whining about it, he is playing the victim.
Granted it was just one side of the story, but a former coworker had to pay her ex-husband alimony AND he was awarded primary custody of their kids (because she sometimes travels for work). She was steamed. She'd paid for his school, and then (her story) he just never really looked for a job. So by default, he took care of their kids. She was PISSED. (In reality, maybe a graphic arts degree was not that useful; most places do not hire graphic-specific people - they hire tech writers who can do graphics, or administrative assistants who can do graphics, or network administrators who can do graphics. It's just not that highly valued here as a stand-alone skill. It's entirely possible that he looked hard and didn't share quite how hard with her for feeling like a failure or something.)Plenty of other people have made the age old, he/she who has the most lucrative job works, and he/she who doesn't stays home with the kid(s). When a couple decides that together, in the case of a divorce, with the loss of skills and work-history and what-have-you due to a joint decision, hell yeah the court should consider that.
But anyway...I am finding that while I like my house and all my space being mine, I might be flexible on that again someday.