0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Y'know - when you don't capitalize it - "iaaf" kinds looks like "laff"
Lung capacity has never been a determining factor of which category you run in. And if testosterone were to be treated like lung capacity, ALL woman would be able to use whatever means to increase it to their benefit.
Not necessarily. Caster's testosterone situation is similar to Coyote's lung capacity ( yes I went there). It's a natural occurrence, giving the athlete a competitive advantage. Why not treat natural bodily advantages like natural bodily advantages, nothing more. It doesn't mean allowing all women to turn into the East Germans.
I have an opinion on all this, don't know if it's right. And in fact nothing seems right. Caster racing against women born without the chromosomal and testosterone advantages does not seem fair, but nor do the rulings which seem arbitrary.
1 to all of itIt would be fantastic if there were enough intersex athletes to create another division. It's not realistic. And also it's not just enough to have competitors, as women's sports show us across the whole spectrum of sports. There also has to be interest in watching them AND revenue generation and still if the powers that be don't want to pay them as well, they won't.
I always thought the chorus of Talking Heads "The Big Country" referred to New Jersey [David Byrne - being a New Yorker - is morally obligated to hate NJ]I wouldn't live there if you paid meI wouldn't live like that, no SireeI wouldn't do the things the way those people doI wouldn't live there if you paid me toI realized a while ago, it was actually about Connecticut