is it really misleading though, or just non-regulation? my interpretation was that he guidelines may be out of date and because the guidelines have to be general, it might not be possible to distinguish between healthy and unhealthy on component nutrients alone (i.e. not all saturated fats are created equal)
I still believe that food companies should follow current guidelines. In this case, it would have been best not to use the word "healthy" at all, since it's regulated with a specific definition. In this sense, it is indeed misleading to me.
